Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 23:12:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 23:12:44 -0500 Received: from [200.216.82.160] ([200.216.82.160]:39176 "EHLO pervalidus.dyndns.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 23:12:33 -0500 Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 01:41:54 -0200 From: Fr?d?ric L . W . Meunier <0@pervalidus.net> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: USB mass storage backport status? Message-ID: <20001213014154.H1245@pervalidus> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i X-Mailer: Mutt/1.2.5i - Linux 2.2.18 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org What's the real status of the mass storage backport to 2.2.18? Some people report it can corrupt your data, another that it rebooted his computer while doing a large trasnfer, and so on. If it's not good, shouldn't it be removed or labeled DANGEROUS? BTW, where can I see a list of what's backported and working without major problems? -- 0@pervalidus.{net,{dyndns.}org} TelFax: 55-21-717-2399 (Niter?i-RJ BR) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/