Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 20:11:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 20:11:20 -0400 Received: from mail.ocs.com.au ([203.34.97.2]:22546 "HELO mail.ocs.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 20:11:16 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 From: Keith Owens To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: system call In-reply-to: Your message of "09 Jul 2002 01:59:42 +0200." <1026172783.2084.26.camel@server1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2002 10:13:47 +1000 Message-ID: <22091.1026173627@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1046 Lines: 22 On 09 Jul 2002 01:59:42 +0200, Vladimir Zidar wrote: >On Mon, 2002-07-08 at 17:16, Randy.Dunlap wrote: >> http://www.xenotime.net/linux/syscall_ex/ >> contains a howto, kernel patch, and test program. > > And how to choose goot syscall number ? Are some numbers pre-reserved >to 'private' syscalls ? What numbers are free to use, without fear that >new kernel release will just jump over them !? > And what about an idea to be able to add syscall by name, from loadab;e >module of course. Userland application will then resolve 'name' to >number at startup, and use it just as ordinary syscall ? http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=100902098800001&r=1&w=2. There were alternative patches going around, primarily from Benjamin LaHaise. Linus did not want any of the patches. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/