Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753419Ab1BNXDN (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Feb 2011 18:03:13 -0500 Received: from blu0-omc1-s6.blu0.hotmail.com ([65.55.116.17]:31488 "EHLO blu0-omc1-s6.blu0.hotmail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751312Ab1BNXDJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Feb 2011 18:03:09 -0500 X-Originating-IP: [174.91.193.52] X-Originating-Email: [pdumas9@sympatico.ca] Message-ID: Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 18:03:01 -0500 From: Mathieu Desnoyers To: Matt Fleming CC: David Miller , rostedt@goodmis.org, peterz@infradead.org, will.newton@gmail.com, jbaron@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, andi@firstfloor.org, roland@redhat.com, rth@redhat.com, masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, avi@redhat.com, sam@ravnborg.org, ddaney@caviumnetworks.com, michael@ellerman.id.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vapier@gentoo.org, cmetcalf@tilera.com, dhowells@redhat.com, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org, "Paul E. McKenney" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] jump label: 2.6.38 updates References: <1297707868.5226.189.camel@laptop> <1297718964.23343.75.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <1297719576.23343.80.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <20110214.134600.179933733.davem@davemloft.net> <20110214223755.436e7cf4@mfleming-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110214223755.436e7cf4@mfleming-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com> X-Editor: vi X-Info: http://krystal.dyndns.org:8080 X-Operating-System: Linux/2.6.27.31-grsec (i686) X-Uptime: 17:55:46 up 313 days, 8:45, 7 users, load average: 1.16, 1.41, 1.42 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Feb 2011 23:03:07.0821 (UTC) FILETIME=[57FA4DD0:01CBCC9B] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2233 Lines: 66 * Matt Fleming (matt@console-pimps.org) wrote: > On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 13:46:00 -0800 (PST) > David Miller wrote: > > > From: Steven Rostedt > > Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 16:39:36 -0500 > > > > > Thus it is not about global, as global is updated by normal means > > > and will update the caches. atomic_t is updated via the ll/sc that > > > ignores the cache and causes all this to break down. IOW... broken > > > hardware ;) > > > > I don't see how cache coherency can possibly work if the hardware > > behaves this way. > > Cache coherency is still maintained provided writes/reads both go > through the cache ;-) > > The problem is that for read-modify-write operations the arbitration > logic that decides who "wins" and is allowed to actually perform the > write, assuming two or more CPUs are competing for a single memory > address, is not implemented in the cache controller, I think. I'm not a > hardware engineer and I never understood how the arbitration logic > worked but I'm guessing that's the reason that the ll/sc instructions > bypass the cache. > > Which is why the atomic_t functions worked out really well for that > arch, such that any accesses to an atomic_t * had to go through the > wrapper functions. If this is true, then we have bugs in lots of xchg/cmpxchg users (which do not reside in atomic.h), e.g.: fs/fs_struct.c: int current_umask(void) { return current->fs->umask; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(current_umask); kernel/sys.c: SYSCALL_DEFINE1(umask, int, mask) { mask = xchg(¤t->fs->umask, mask & S_IRWXUGO); return mask; } The solution to this would be to force all xchg/cmpxchg users to swap to atomic.h variables, which would force the ll semantic on read. But I'd really like to see where this is documented first -- or which PowerPC engineer we should talk to. Thanks, Mathieu -- Mathieu Desnoyers Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/