Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 08:44:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 08:44:44 -0400 Received: from mion.elka.pw.edu.pl ([194.29.160.35]:25813 "EHLO mion.elka.pw.edu.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 08:44:41 -0400 Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 14:46:58 +0200 (MET DST) From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz To: Martin Dalecki cc: Paul Bristow , Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.5.22] simple ide-tape.c and ide-floppy.c cleanup In-Reply-To: <3D2AD6EE.6020303@evision-ventures.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2610 Lines: 70 On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Martin Dalecki wrote: > U?ytkownik Paul Bristow napisa?: > > OK. I kept quiet while the IDE re-write went on so that when it was > > over I could fix up ide-floppy and start adding some of the requested > > features that were only really possible with the taskfile capabilities. > > But I have to jump in with the latest statements from Martin... > > Martin Dalecki wrote: > > > >> U?ytkownik Eduard Bloch napisa?: > >> > >> > >>> Why not another way round? Just make the ide-scsi driver be prefered, > >>> and hack ide-scsi a bit to simulate the cdrom and adv.floppy devices > >>> that are expected as /dev/hd* by some user's configuration? > >>> > >> > >> > >> This is the intention. > >> > > Since when? I thought Jens was in the process of getting rid of the > > ide-scsi kludge with his moves to support cd/dvd writing directly in > > ide-cd? > > Well code decides. And in reality I have tried the much simpler goal > to unify the ide-floppy ide-tape and ide-cd parts which > should be common. Like for example a simple SCSI multi media command set > preparation library. Admittedly I have failed. Therefore and in > fact of the 2.6 release schedule it's simple not practical to > persue this road further. It makes much more sense to just > > 1. Scrap the specific atapi drivers. > > 2. Try to make ide-scsi independant from SCSI subsystem from users view. > > 3. Replicate some of the workarounds in the previous ide-xxxx drivers. And how will you support i.e. DSC in ide-tape? > > > > The current system may be ugly, but if we have to break it in the name > > of progress we have at least to make the new, improved version work as > > well (and hopefully better) than the old one. > > > >>> Other operating systems did switch to constitent (scsi-based) way of > >>> accessing all kinds of removable media drivers. Why does Linux have to > >>> keep a kludge, written years ago without having a good concept? > >>> > >>> > >> > > If we can address all these issues I will be extremely happy to helping > > create a sensible removeable media subsystem. > > That's a deal. > > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/