Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 02:18:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 02:18:30 -0500 Received: from adsl-63-195-162-81.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net ([63.195.162.81]:36101 "EHLO master.linux-ide.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 02:18:12 -0500 Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 22:47:35 -0800 (PST) From: Andre Hedrick To: alex@foogod.com cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] I-Opener fix (again) In-Reply-To: <20001211152331.M10618@draco.foogod.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Basically if the setting of * "hdx=flash" : allows for more than one ata_flash disk to be * registered. In most cases, only one device * will be present. fails then I will look into this but, the breaking of laptops that have CFA devices that do not come on channels in a pair canb not happen. If you have a vender unique setting that will follow always the way I-Opener's are setup then that is better. Cheers, On Mon, 11 Dec 2000 alex@foogod.com wrote: > It's been a few months (and a couple of kernel releases) since I mentioned this > before and it doesn't look like it's made it in, and I haven't seen any more > comments on it in the list archives, so I'm bringing it up again in case it > just got forgotten about somewhere along the line.. > > As I remember, Andre Hedrick had asked for clarification on my original post, > and I sent a followup message in response, but now I can't seem to find it > anywhere in the archives, so I don't know whether it never made it out of my > mailer or.. > > In any case, attached is a patch (against 2.4.0pre11) which fixes the bug which > causes disk detection issues on I-Opener (and possibly other unusual) hardware. > > The problem is that the code assumes that a flash-disk will always be the > primary disk on an interface, but on the I-Opener this is not always the case. > If a traditional disk is primary, and a flashdisk is secondary, the detection > code (wrongly) disables the primary disk that it had already previously > detected. > > I would like to see this make it into the official source as it's a very small > change that fixes some obviously wrong behavior.. > > -alex > Andre Hedrick CTO Timpanogas Research Group EVP Linux Development, TRG Linux ATA Development - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/