Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932753Ab1BPCBS (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Feb 2011 21:01:18 -0500 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]:58651 "HELO mailout-de.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1758642Ab1BPCBO (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Feb 2011 21:01:14 -0500 X-Authenticated: #14349625 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/3fvIkfe33spKUMWRifYl0QZ95nBdXDFewi8tuFB Dn6BVu+tn4ZW2k Subject: Re: Patch "sched: Give CPU bound RT tasks preference" has been added to the 2.6.32-longterm tree From: Mike Galbraith To: Steven Rostedt Cc: gregkh@suse.de, srostedt , a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, ghaskins@novell.com, mingo@elte.hu, stable@kernel.org, stable-commits@vger.kernel.org, LKML In-Reply-To: <1297810967.23343.122.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> References: <12978046423644@kroah.org> <1297810967.23343.122.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 03:01:07 +0100 Message-ID: <1297821667.5126.11.camel@marge.simson.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.1.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1398 Lines: 37 On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 18:02 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > [ Added LKML ] > > On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 13:17 -0800, gregkh@suse.de wrote: > > This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled > > > > sched: Give CPU bound RT tasks preference > > > > to the 2.6.32-longterm tree which can be found at: > > http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/longterm/longterm-queue-2.6.32.git;a=summary > > > > The filename of the patch is: > > 0006-sched-Give-CPU-bound-RT-tasks-preference.patch > > and it can be found in the queue-2.6.32 subdirectory. > > > > If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the 2.6.32 longterm tree, > > please let know about it. > > > > > > I don't mind this patch being added to the long term tree. But I'm > curious about what is the criteria for adding changes to it? This is a > performance improvement and not a critical bug fix. Yes, I added it for the performance. .32-stable is enterprise beans and biscuits. Same reason I added the load balancing fixes, boxen won't explode without them, but load balancing performs better with them. -Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/