Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:48:50 -0500
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>, Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
        stable-review@kernel.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [stable] [000/272] 2.6.37.1-stable review
Message-ID: <20110216154850.GB3921@dumpdata.com>
References: <20110216001559.GA31413@kroah.com>
 <4D5B8DAE.5000105@canonical.com>
 <20110216145354.GB12215@dumpdata.com>
 <4D5BEDEA.3040208@canonical.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4D5BEDEA.3040208@canonical.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 914
Lines: 20

On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 04:31:54PM +0100, Stefan Bader wrote:
> On 02/16/2011 03:53 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 09:41:18AM +0100, Stefan Bader wrote:
> >> I had been submitted the following two backports for 2.6.37.y (only for that)
> >> but do not see them in the current batch. I know 270+ is already big and they
> >> may come later. Just wanted to ensure they have not fallen through the cracks.
> > 
> > Hmm, do you want to provide the other variant please?
> > 
> > cf04d120d9413de581437cf9a29f138ec1178f65
> 
> That was the second patch. I just submitted both to keep them in line with what
> went to upstream.

Ohh. Duh! Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/