Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754300Ab1BQOiU (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Feb 2011 09:38:20 -0500 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com ([66.165.176.63]:47633 "EHLO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751731Ab1BQOiR (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Feb 2011 09:38:17 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,486,1291611600"; d="scan'208";a="136336905" Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Xen PCI fronted fixes for 2.6.39 From: Ian Campbell To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk CC: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , "Stefano Stabellini" In-Reply-To: <20110217142807.GD5987@dumpdata.com> References: <1297894638-28007-1-git-send-email-konrad.wilk@oracle.com> <1297931344.16356.1268.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <20110217142807.GD5987@dumpdata.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Organization: Citrix Systems, Inc. Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 14:38:14 +0000 Message-ID: <1297953494.16356.1738.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1403 Lines: 33 On Thu, 2011-02-17 at 14:28 +0000, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 08:29:04AM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 22:17 +0000, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > > I am proposing these three patches for 2.6.39. > > > > > > The first is to take advantage of the new method of requesting > > > a Linux IRQ and providing the Xen PIRQ value. The second > > > makes it possible for a PV guest to bootup if the backend has provided > > > incorrect values. [*2] > > > > I approve of being liberal in what is accepted but do we also have a > > handle on why the backend is providing incorrect values in the first > > place? > > I got those fixed too - was using 'xen_irq_from_gsi' while > it should have used 'xen_irq_from_pirq'. This was the new mechanism > to obtain the vector values after .. 2.6.38-rc1 ish.. (as the > GSI values now have the correct value of zero, and the vector value > for MSI/MSI-X is written in the PIRQ entry). > > But those patches are in a different branch (devel/xen-pciback-0.3). Thanks, it may be worth co-referencing the front and backend fixes in their respective commit messages. Ian. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/