Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 15:44:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 15:44:02 -0400 Received: from smtp013.mail.yahoo.com ([216.136.173.57]:23565 "HELO smtp013.mail.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 15:44:01 -0400 Subject: how to debug it? From: Michael Gruner To: Joseph Pingenot Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20020709133606.A8202@ksu.edu> References: <1026193021.1076.29.camel@highflyer> <200207091227.15957.bernd-schubert@web.de> <1026232702.757.9.camel@highflyer> <20020709133606.A8202@ksu.edu> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1026243598.757.56.camel@highflyer> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 Date: 09 Jul 2002 21:40:51 +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2097 Lines: 46 > >ok, did it as you say: in the BIOS I switched to Vsync/blank screen. > >Let's see what happens. > >BTW: My graphics card isn't a nvidia as many of you suggested but an ATI > >Rage pro (what did you wrote Bernd? ;-) ). > >Another interesting thing I got back in mind today was: one day my XMMS > >played a mp3 song and I switched to console (oooops...you know what > >happend) but the song kept on playing in a loop that was some > >milliseconds until I powered the box off. I don't know what to think > >about that. > > I've seen the same thing on my ATI XPert@Play (Rage Pro chipset). At > 2.4.17, it was a risky proposition to switch between X and a text VC. > It's better in 2.4.18, although not much (I believe. I may be wrong). > I have happend upon a situation a number of times where, when switching > from X to a text VC, the machine "locks up", but CTRL-F7 (the X VC) will > get me back to a working X login screen (KDM), at least for a while. If > I keep trying to switch to a text VC (which never works), it eventually > fully locks up, to the point where I have to pull the plug, since the on > switch is non-responsive. If I tell it to shut down, it gets *most* of > the way through before carping out and locking up fully. > I don't *believe* I've seen this in 2.5.x, although I may be wrong. > Do you think it would be a good idea to get it out of the stable tree? Or is it better to try to live with it and wait for getting 2.5 the stable tree? Is there a howto to get this debugged? Looking into /var/log/messages there are no messages that could point out that bad thing. michael -- Windmuehlenweg 22 07907 Schleiz mobil: +491628955029 e-Mail: Michael.Gruner@fh-hof.de _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/