Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 17:46:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 17:46:23 -0400 Received: from front2.mail.megapathdsl.net ([66.80.60.30]:22286 "EHLO front2.mail.megapathdsl.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 17:46:18 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.4 IDE core for 2.5 From: Miles Lane To: Jens Axboe Cc: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk , Linux Kernel , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20020709112054.GB9551@suse.de> References: <20020709102249.GA20870@suse.de> <200207091313.07199.roy@karlsbakk.net> <20020709112054.GB9551@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Message-Id: <1026250991.27696.1.camel@turbulence.megapathdsl.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.1.0.99 (Preview Release) Date: 09 Jul 2002 14:43:12 -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1013 Lines: 26 On Tue, 2002-07-09 at 04:20, Jens Axboe wrote: > On Tue, Jul 09 2002, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote: > > hi > > > > Should I add IDE9[4567] as well, or does these ones include previous IDE > > pathes? > > Well, the whole point of this patch set is _not_ to use the 2.5 ide core > for now. When configuring your kernel, you get the choice of using > 2.4-ide or 2.5-ide. If you choose 2.5-ide, then yes you should add those > patches (I guess). If you choose 2.4-ide (which most users of the patch > set would do, why else apply it?!), then it doesn't matter. Thankyou Jens, It is really quite perturbing to think how much the IDE instability has held back development of other features in the unstable kernel. The warm reception of your patch speaks volumes. Miles - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/