Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 01:41:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 01:41:16 -0400 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:6051 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 01:41:15 -0400 Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 07:43:56 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: Andries Brouwer Cc: Linux Kernel , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.4 IDE core for 2.5 Message-ID: <20020710054356.GE3185@suse.de> References: <20020709102249.GA20870@suse.de> <20020709200711.GA13401@win.tue.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020709200711.GA13401@win.tue.nl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1826 Lines: 54 On Tue, Jul 09 2002, Andries Brouwer wrote: > On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 12:22:49PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote: > > > I've forward ported the 2.4 IDE core to 2.5.25. > > Very good! > > There are two kinds of objections. > The minor one is political - you can imagine. Naturally. > The major one is technical. You did not port the 2.4 good PIO > behaviour to 2.5. Bartlomiej already warned about this, so I > need only confirm: > > This afternoon I booted 2.5.25 with your patches and two more, > one to prevent an oops when shutting down, the other to fix > ethernet cards detection. Started torturing two disks on > HPT366. After 3 minutes > > hde: status error: status=0x50 { DriveReady SeekComplete } > hde: no DRQ after issuing WRITE > > and seven minutes later > > hde: task_out_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error } > hde: task_out_intr: error=0x04 { DriveStatusError } > > Soon lots of processes were hanging in D. Reboot. e2fsck. The above seems to be plain pio, you didn't use multi mode did you? I think my current tree has the multi-page multi mode bio issue resolved, however I'll test for some hours before sending out the next patch set. > Then booted vanilla 2.4.17. Tortured disks in the same way. > After several hours all is still perfect. I'll leave this > for a night, but so far I have never seen these errors on 2.4 > and very often in recent 2.5. Good to know. Thanks for your report, it'll probably take a day or two before the kinks of the 2.5 conversion have been ironed out and the ide core is as stable as 2.4. -- Jens Axboe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/