Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753606Ab1BSQrQ (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Feb 2011 11:47:16 -0500 Received: from earthlight.etchedpixels.co.uk ([81.2.110.250]:46971 "EHLO www.etchedpixels.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751117Ab1BSQrO convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Feb 2011 11:47:14 -0500 Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 16:48:11 +0000 From: Alan Cox To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Cc: Sergei Shtylyov , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/20] pata_efar: always program master_data before slave_data Message-ID: <20110219164811.2e90de88@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: References: <20110208122314.19110.4092.sendpatchset@linux-mhg7.site> <20110208122409.19110.4233.sendpatchset@linux-mhg7.site> <20110208130701.19709cc6@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20110208132518.300bb098@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <4D514754.30203@ru.mvista.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.8 (GTK+ 2.22.0; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-14 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 781 Lines: 20 > > ? SLC90E66 datasheet only says that SIDETIM register has no effect without > > SITRE bit set. Which means the current setup is fine yes ? > Alan, is this explanation sufficient to ACK this patch? (Thanks > Sergei for digging it out.) > > Jeff, would it be possible to queue patches #01-15 for 2.6.39 Have they been tested on the relevant hardware yet - I don't believe the changes should be made for the untested stuff and you indicated you agreed with that. The tidyups for the easily tested cases (PIIX4 etc) look sensible -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/