Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753804Ab1BTNVi (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Feb 2011 08:21:38 -0500 Received: from cable-static-49-187.intergga.ch ([157.161.49.187]:47680 "EHLO mail.ffwll.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753206Ab1BTNVh (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Feb 2011 08:21:37 -0500 X-Spam-ASN: X-Spam-Spammy: 0.965-+--H*r:mail.ffwll.ch, 0.941-+--H*Ad:D*ffwll.ch, 0.930-+--H*Ad:D*ch X-Spam-Hammy: 0.000-+--H*Ad:U*dri-devel, 0.000-+--HCc:D*freedesktop.org, 0.000-+--HCc:D*lists.freedesktop.org Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 14:21:16 +0100 From: Daniel Vetter To: Indan Zupancic Cc: Daniel Vetter , Chris Wilson , LKML , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: [BUG] drm/i915 Screen corruption introduced by a00b10c360b35d6431a94cb Message-ID: <20110220132115.GC3514@viiv.ffwll.ch> Mail-Followup-To: Indan Zupancic , Chris Wilson , LKML , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org References: <3f9bbd0924f54f6241cc16293fbcbbb4.squirrel@webmail.greenhost.nl> <20110219182511.GA3977@viiv.ffwll.ch> <92f5b87a3559ed7f1b7c46b7497c1ad5.squirrel@webmail.greenhost.nl> <20110220105514.GB3514@viiv.ffwll.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: Linux viiv 2.6.38-rc5-00035-g3077686 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1125 Lines: 31 On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 12:19:14PM +0100, Indan Zupancic wrote: > Hi, > > Good news: > > On Sun, February 20, 2011 11:55, Daniel Vetter wrote: > >> > I've created two quick patches to check a few theories, please test them > >> > (both patches independently and both together). Patches attached. > >> > >> Tried with both applied, doesn't change anything. > > > > I've just noticed that one of the patches (the 2nd one) doesn't work as > > advertised. Please retest with the attached one. > > This one fixes it! Well, don't start jumping around, yet. These patches are just to rule out some theories. Now: Is it fixed with just the 2nd patch alone or do you need both patches? This is very important, so please test extensively whether there are really no corruptions with just the 2nd patch. Yours, Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Mail: daniel@ffwll.ch Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/