Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756167Ab1BUQ7T (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Feb 2011 11:59:19 -0500 Received: from mail-fx0-f46.google.com ([209.85.161.46]:59771 "EHLO mail-fx0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756113Ab1BUQ7R (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Feb 2011 11:59:17 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=K91khwki+/k83S75u432pYuMuJ5eY9ifBNXyymOASsHMZFnPf+B736srNxt0tsZjRO Ln7jiqMkNcM95Rwl2JMkyyrsvNWsaiGfDqwq5QPlizGQOcOLw3qgZA5pWxYPeANqe7Qu iSkOULtUE+RliC8CF5xT273lfJEa8AwFoO+kA= Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 17:59:08 +0100 From: Tejun Heo To: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Roland McGrath , Denys Vlasenko , jan.kratochvil@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ptrace: make sure do_wait() won't hang after PTRACE_ATTACH Message-ID: <20110221165908.GO31267@htj.dyndns.org> References: <20110214190141.GA19221@redhat.com> <20110214200130.GA21559@redhat.com> <20110215152448.GL3160@htj.dyndns.org> <20110215173149.239601807B7@magilla.sf.frob.com> <20110215202747.GA20560@redhat.com> <20110218170212.GS21209@htj.dyndns.org> <20110218193709.GA9700@redhat.com> <20110221162206.GN31267@htj.dyndns.org> <20110221164908.GA25803@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110221164908.GA25803@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 927 Lines: 24 Hey, On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 05:49:08PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > BTW, I plan on separating out all ptrace related stuff into a separate > > struct as it's not used by most tasks anyway, so I don't think we need > > to be too concerned about several more fields. > > This is funny. > > I already did this change (it even had some review on lkml). And it was > discussed again (on archer@sourceware.org) a couple of days ago. Yes, > probably we should finally do this. Unfortunately, this complicates the > attach-to-all-threads request (new feature), but anyway. Heh, well, I also have a mostly working patch but hey if you already did it, all the better. :-) -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/