Message-ID: <8a955ec5ebee88511413424fdcaf85c4.squirrel@webmail.greenhost.nl>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 04:25:15 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: [BUG] drm/i915 Screen corruption introduced by 
     a00b10c360b35d6431a94cb
From: "Indan Zupancic" <indan@nul.nu>
To: "Indan Zupancic" <indan@nul.nu>, "Chris Wilson" <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
        "LKML" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.17
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Importance: Normal
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1276
Lines: 33

Hi,

On Sun, February 20, 2011 14:21, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Well, don't start jumping around, yet. These patches are just to rule out
> some theories. Now: Is it fixed with just the 2nd patch alone or do you need both
> patches? This is very important, so please test extensively whether there are really
> no corruptions with just the 2nd patch.

I managed to create some corruption with an xterm above xpdf. It looks  different
than the original corruption, so I think it's safe to say it's a different bug:

http://img593.imageshack.us/i/ss1298340823.png
http://img203.imageshack.us/i/ss1298340776.png

This was without xcompmgr running, I don't think I would have seen it otherwise.
Actually, it turns out it's really easy to trigger as well, so I can more easily
test patches now. Unfortunately I wasn't smart enough to store the bisecting kernels,
gah!

I tried with both your patches, as well as the HIC poking patch, but I still get it.

I'll try to pinpoint more exactly when this started to happen.

Greetings,

Indan


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/