Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 15:36:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 15:36:35 -0400 Received: from mail.clsp.jhu.edu ([128.220.34.27]:41201 "EHLO mail.clsp.jhu.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 15:36:34 -0400 Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 02:43:20 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Thunder from the hill Cc: Oliver Neukum , Keith Owens , Patrick Mochel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Driverfs updates Message-ID: <20020710004320.GC596@elf.ucw.cz> References: <200207091030.17096.oliver@neukum.name> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 889 Lines: 23 Hi! > > -It is slow. > > I wouldn't call it any fast when I think about the idea that 31 of my CPUs > on Hawkeye shall be stopped because I unload a module. Sometimes at high > noon my server (Hawkeye) can hardly keep up all the traffic. Just imagine > a module would be unloaded then! That's the problem I'm having with it. > > What should make a lock for parts of the kernel slower than a lock for > the _whole_ kernel? Lock for the whole kernel has less impact over overall code, I believe. Pavel -- Worst form of spam? Adding advertisment signatures ala sourceforge.net. What goes next? Inserting advertisment *into* email? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/