Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754816Ab1BVRjn (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Feb 2011 12:39:43 -0500 Received: from mail-bw0-f51.google.com ([209.85.214.51]:56679 "EHLO mail-bw0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752543Ab1BVRjm (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Feb 2011 12:39:42 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=m4w2aQpw4qRriWha9oHQ9Fg9m2T1IkRAOqwpWwqGXIufiVsAlWwy+xvdVtDqKM6IfB fzxUyy6hSCL4nLk/U2EP5b83DUlUgW5CAC+rsbw9SoFswRR8EfdnlREzQxhRN56JxNAW EBZoEyRTLGeDZrXeIf6MfvLs8gduk1ga834Iw= Message-ID: <4D63F4D9.6030505@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 18:39:37 +0100 From: Jiri Slaby User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; cs-CZ; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101206 SUSE/3.1.7 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stefan Berger CC: Rajiv Andrade , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-pm , stable@kernel.org, Linux kernel mailing list , debora@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Linus Torvalds , preining@logic.at Subject: Re: 2.6.37.1 s2disk regression (TPM) References: <4D60E93D.1050205@gmail.com> <4D60F108.9000106@gmail.com> <201102201151.11635.rjw@sisk.pl> <201102201248.10779.rjw@sisk.pl> <4D628521.8000205@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4D629427.8020500@gmail.com> <4D629D03.90801@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4D62CD93.3040206@gmail.com> <4D62D930.8060304@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4D62DCBA.9050609@gmail.com> <4D62E221.7010104@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4D62E2F2.4060406@gmail.com> <4D63066D.3080701@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4D6376A9.5060704@gmail.com> <4D63A4B8.8040106@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <4D63A4B8.8040106@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 998 Lines: 27 On 02/22/2011 12:57 PM, Stefan Berger wrote: > The forthcoming patch will simply also adapt the other 2 values and > multiply them by 1000. The reason for the suspend failure is the 2nd > timeout with TPM_SaveState command being of medium duration. > > There will be a 2nd patch for re-enabling the TPM's interrupts that the > BIOS may (this may be BIOS-dependent) have disabled while sending a > command (TPM_Startup) to the TPM upon resume and having used polling > mode and leaving it with the interrupts disabled. > > I'd appreciate it if you tested both of them. I didn't get any. Could you add a pointer to them? BTW. there is another guy who hit this. He has: /sys/devices/pnp0/00:02/timeouts:1000000 2000 150000 like I do. regards, -- js -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/