Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754896Ab1BXIFA (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Feb 2011 03:05:00 -0500 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23]:39054 "HELO mailout-de.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1754504Ab1BXIE7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Feb 2011 03:04:59 -0500 X-Authenticated: #23875046 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19PbfEpJ6lPtYgOoT948fmaggviXrrg1by1P2AjsF PZWjAjzKi/TaxE Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 v2] Unify rest of FAT messages. From: Alexey Fisher To: OGAWA Hirofumi Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, joe@perches.com In-Reply-To: <8739r8q4s3.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> References: <1289321718-6373-1-git-send-email-bug-track@fisher-privat.net> <1289329470-14454-1-git-send-email-bug-track@fisher-privat.net> <87hbfppfu3.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> <1289392908.6057.44.camel@zwerg> <87d3qdp9oa.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> <1289401644.2438.34.camel@mini> <878w11p1wk.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> <1289408312.3636.10.camel@mini> <8739r8q4s3.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 09:04:52 +0100 Message-ID: <1298534692.6569.0.camel@mini> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1648 Lines: 43 Hi, are there any updates on this issue? Am Donnerstag, den 11.11.2010, 05:53 +0900 schrieb OGAWA Hirofumi: > Alexey Fisher writes: > > >> Also, yes. It would be complicate more or less than one FS. And maybe I > >> can understand why you want to concentrate FAT. > >> > >> But I'm afraid to implement for only FAT. If there is not any some sort > >> of agreement by others, it may have to re-implement. If that happen, FAT > >> can be bothered by compatible (or have to maintain both of old and new > >> for a while). Because the notified data are some sort of ABI, IMO. > >> > >> This is why I'm careful about this, and can't say easily - "let's try it > >> on FAT". > > > > I'm not sure if we talk about same thing now :D > > By notification you mean the idea to notify userspace about error? > > correct? > > Sure. I was talking about "to notify userspace". :) > > > In my previous email i switched the point, it will be to complicate for > > now to work on notification system. For now i'll be happy to see grep > > friendly logs. Same like ext2,3,4 do > > > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=4cf46b67eb6de94532c1bea11d2479d085229d0e > > > > In long term it will be good to have such notification system. So i will > > start new tread about it. > > OK, I see. I'll review patches. Looks good though. > > Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/