Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755356Ab1BXSWi (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Feb 2011 13:22:38 -0500 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:49401 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755253Ab1BXSWh (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Feb 2011 13:22:37 -0500 Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 10:21:33 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Roland Vossen Cc: Arend Van Spriel , Ben Hutchings , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "stable@kernel.org" , Brett Rudley , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , "torvalds@linux-foundation.org" , "stable-review@kernel.org" , "alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk" Subject: Re: [Stable-review] [28/70] staging: brcm80211: bugfix for softmac crash on multi cpu configurations Message-ID: <20110224182133.GA18081@suse.de> References: <20110222221839.853712243@clark.kroah.org> <1298427787.2211.498.camel@localhost> <20110223180627.GB30106@suse.de> <4D6658D7.1010501@broadcom.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D6658D7.1010501@broadcom.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1806 Lines: 46 On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 02:10:47PM +0100, Roland Vossen wrote: > Hi Greg, > > >>So, what should I do here? Drop the referenced patch from the > >>.37-stable queue, or do you have the text for the changelog that I > >>should use here instead? > >> > >>confused, > >> > > > >Dito here. I submitted a patch for the stable kernel and Roland did one > >(if I am correct). I have no clue how his commit message came with my > >patch or vice versa. > > > > Let me try to clear up part of the confusion. > > The short story is: for some mysterious reason, a patch exists that > is a mixup of two patches (one from Arend and one from me). It > contains the commit message from me, but the file changes from > Arend. This 'hybrid' patch was submitted for review by you. This > patch did not make it yet into the 2.6.37-stable tree. > > Also, neither Arends nor my Patch ended up in the 2.6.37-stable tree. > > To fix this problem, I think that this hybrid patch has to be review > rejected. Next, new patches have to be created based on Rolands > patch (6a3be6e6e7feb4cb35275475d6a863b748d59cc3, as submitted into > gregkh/staging-2.6.git::staging-linus branch) as well as Arends > patch (d062d44a8386c82c06e483f0c0d1124ba3cab2c8). These patches > would then have to be reviewed for the 2.6.37-stable tree. Ok, I'm going to drop this patch now. Can someone create the needed patches for the .37-stable tree that should be included and send them to me and cc: stable@kernel.org so I can queue them up for the next .37-stable release after this? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/