Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 12:58:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 12:58:44 -0400 Received: from [195.63.194.11] ([195.63.194.11]:15878 "EHLO mail.stock-world.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 12:58:43 -0400 Message-ID: <3D2DB9DF.4010002@evision-ventures.com> Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 19:01:19 +0200 From: Martin Dalecki User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; pl-PL; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020611 X-Accept-Language: pl, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Benjamin LaHaise CC: Andrew Morton , "Grover, Andrew" , Linux Subject: Re: HZ, preferably as small as possible References: <59885C5E3098D511AD690002A5072D3C02AB7F88@orsmsx111.jf.intel.com> <3D2CA6E3.CB5BC420@zip.com.au> <20020710173555.D2005@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 676 Lines: 19 U?ytkownik Benjamin LaHaise napisa?: > On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 02:28:03PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > >>>But on the other hand, increasing HZ has perf/latency benefits, yes? Have >>>these been quantified? >> >>Not that I'm aware of. And I'd regard any such claims with some >>scepticism. > > > The most obvious one is the reduced latency of select/poll timeouts. Which you can actually see if running x11perf or simple ico. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/