Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753466Ab1B1LTx (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Feb 2011 06:19:53 -0500 Received: from mail-fx0-f46.google.com ([209.85.161.46]:57087 "EHLO mail-fx0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753155Ab1B1LTw (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Feb 2011 06:19:52 -0500 Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 11:19:49 +0000 From: Jamie Iles To: John Linn Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, catalin.marinas@arm.com, glikely@secretlab.ca, jamie@jamieiles.com, arnd@arndb.de Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 0/4] ARM: Basic Xilinx Support Message-ID: <20110228111949.GC2754@pulham.picochip.com> References: <0d410c20-32b4-46d6-9639-249a2816cbe9@VA3EHSMHS005.ehs.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0d410c20-32b4-46d6-9639-249a2816cbe9@VA3EHSMHS005.ehs.local> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1558 Lines: 44 On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 11:14:37AM -0700, John Linn wrote: > > V4 > > I incorporated more feedback from Jamie Iles. It was > primariy cleanup with the only significant change > being a move to using raw_read/write in the uncompressor > uart code. > > The other changes were minor updates so that the patch > set applies to linux-next. > > This patch set is now tested against the linux-next branch > from pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfr/linux-next.git. Hi John, I've just tried a quick dummy build of this series (with a fudge in mach-types to get it building) and I see a couple of minor sparse warnings: arch/arm/mach-xilinx/common.c:54:13: warning: symbol 'xilinx_system_init' was not declared. Should it be static? arch/arm/mach-xilinx/common.c:68:13: warning: symbol 'xilinx_irq_init' was not declared. Should it be static? arch/arm/mach-xilinx/common.c:110:13: warning: symbol 'xilinx_map_io' was not declared. Should it be static? arch/arm/mach-xilinx/timer.c:290:18: warning: symbol 'xttcpss_sys_timer' was not declared. Should it be static? I think all of these can be resolved by including "common.h" in both timer.c and common.c. I've put a couple of nitpicks for the individual patches, sorry I didn't spot them before. Otherwise, Reviewed-by: Jamie Iles Jamie -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/