Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 20:21:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 20:21:09 -0400 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:7183 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 20:21:09 -0400 Message-ID: <3D2E211E.24CF19B0@zip.com.au> Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 17:21:50 -0700 From: Andrew Morton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.19-pre8 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thunder from the hill CC: Dawson Engler , Linux Kernel Mailing List , mc@cs.Stanford.EDU Subject: Re: [CHECKER] 56 potential lock/unlock bugs in 2.5.8 References: <200207112135.OAA03801@csl.Stanford.EDU> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 538 Lines: 18 Thunder from the hill wrote: > > Hi, > > Here is the whole set. > It's fair enough for a fix I guess. But careful readers will have observed that a goodly portion of these bugs are directly due to the poor programming practice of putting more than one return statement in a C function. - - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/