Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755570Ab1CAGvL (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Mar 2011 01:51:11 -0500 Received: from e28smtp03.in.ibm.com ([122.248.162.3]:60546 "EHLO e28smtp03.in.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755529Ab1CAGvJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Mar 2011 01:51:09 -0500 From: "Aneesh Kumar K. V" To: "Ted Ts'o" Cc: sfrench@us.ibm.com, agruen@linbit.com, dilger.kernel@dilger.ca, sandeen@redhat.com, bfields@fieldses.org, jlayton@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH -V5 00/24] New ACL format for better NFSv4 acl interoperability In-Reply-To: <20110228211145.GG28617@thunk.org> References: <1298469131-16555-1-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20110228211145.GG28617@thunk.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5-66-g70c5e2c (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 12:20:36 +0530 Message-ID: <87oc5vgwqr.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1792 Lines: 47 On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 16:11:45 -0500, "Ted Ts'o" wrote: > Hi Aneesh, > > What is the current status of this patch series? I seem to remember > that Christoph and Al Viro had some objections; have those been > cleared yet? If not, can you summarize what their objections are? The main objection raised was the use of may_delete and may_create inode operations callback. They are gone now and we have MAY_* flags as favoured by Al Viro. The new MAY_* flags added are #define MAY_CREATE_FILE 128 #define MAY_CREATE_DIR 256 #define MAY_DELETE_CHILD 512 #define MAY_DELETE_SELF 1024 #define MAY_TAKE_OWNERSHIP 2048 #define MAY_CHMOD 4096 #define MAY_SET_TIMES 8192 > > To be honest I haven't been paying super close attention to this patch > series, and I'm curious what needs to happen with it one way or > another. > IMHO we are ready to get first 11 patches upstream in the next merge window. ie the below set of patches. vfs: Make acl_permission_check() work for richacls vfs: Add permission flags for setting file attributes vfs: Make the inode passed to inode_change_ok non-const vfs: Add delete child and delete self permission flags vfs: Add new file and directory create permission flags vfs: Optimize out IS_RICHACL() if CONFIG_FS_RICHACL is not defined vfs: Add IS_RICHACL() test for richacl support vfs: Add generic IS_ACL() test for acl support vfs: Add a comment to inode_permission() vfs: Pass all mask flags down to iop->check_acl vfs: Indicate that the permission functions take all the MAY_* flags -aneesh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/