Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756488Ab1CAO2R (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Mar 2011 09:28:17 -0500 Received: from kroah.org ([198.145.64.141]:57323 "EHLO coco.kroah.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756466Ab1CAO2M (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Mar 2011 09:28:12 -0500 Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 09:29:08 -0500 From: Greg KH To: Alan Cox Cc: Alan Cox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] staging: gma500: Rip out the memory manager Message-ID: <20110301142908.GA13144@kroah.com> References: <20110224162440.27093.80825.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20110224162457.27093.32399.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20110301020302.GA11353@kroah.com> <20110301122437.4477fa65@bob.linux.org.uk> <20110301141527.GA12881@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110301141527.GA12881@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2337 Lines: 66 On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 09:15:27AM -0500, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 12:24:37PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote: > > On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 18:03:02 -0800 > > Greg KH wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 04:25:09PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote: > > > > At this point we simply stuff the display at the start of the > > > > stolen memory area that the BIOS gave us. No user framebuffers no > > > > multiple framebuffers. > > > > > > > > However from here we have a better chance of seeing what is going > > > > on and writing an actual gem manager for the driver. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Alan Cox > > > > > > This doesn't apply. > > > > > > The 1/2 patch had some fuzz in the Makefile, which I fixed up by hand, > > > but it makes me think that you are diffing this against some different > > > tree. > > > > I've investigated this. The cause seems to be a patch > > > > commit 5352161fc449d7a7573b2e13bd02162aae7aeb69 > > > > applied by yourself which cleaned up all sorts of random whitespace > > noise and broke further patch application. Given that this is staging > > and random whitespace is less important than actually fixing the code I > > think the fix is to revert that commit and then apply mine. > > Well, I did copy you on that patch, and let you know I made it, so this > type of thing wouldn't happen. I'll go fix it by just stripping out the > trailing whitespace from your patch :) > > This doesn't seem to explain the Makefile difference in the 1/2 patch > though... And I still don't think this is the issue. Your patch removes two lines from drivers/staging/gma500/psb_drm.h with the following diff: --- a/drivers/staging/gma500/psb_drm.h +++ b/drivers/staging/gma500/psb_drm.h @@ -28,9 +28,6 @@ #include "drm_mode.h" #endif -#include "psb_ttm_fence_user.h" -#include "psb_ttm_placement_user.h" - #define DRM_PSB_SAREA_MAJOR 0 #define DRM_PSB_SAREA_MINOR 2 #define PSB_FIXED_SHIFT 16 Yet those #defines are not present in this file right now. That's not a whitespace change... Still confused, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/