Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 12:47:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 12:47:47 -0500 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:12928 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 12:47:29 -0500 Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 09:01:03 -0800 Message-Id: <200012131701.JAA03695@pizda.ninka.net> From: "David S. Miller" To: fribes@capgemini.fr CC: ak@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <3A37AE70.B5F76D63@capgemini.fr> (message from Fabien Ribes on Wed, 13 Dec 2000 18:14:24 +0100) Subject: Re: Networking: RFC1122 and 1123 status for kernel 2.4 In-Reply-To: <3A30F463.2EE04F4E@capgemini.fr> <200012081454.GAA02632@pizda.ninka.net> <20001208163154.A20038@gruyere.muc.suse.de> <200012081528.HAA02778@pizda.ninka.net> <20001208165855.A20706@gruyere.muc.suse.de> <200012112206.OAA00936@pizda.ninka.net> <3A37AE70.B5F76D63@capgemini.fr> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 18:14:24 +0100 From: Fabien Ribes I may get some time to work on this topic, but what do you mean by kill it ? It means removing all of the "RFC1122 Status" comments from net/ipv4/*.c Is it the removal of RFC 1122 evaluation in modules' headers ? By the way, is RFC 1122 still accurate ? It should be unless some later RFC specifies something which supercedes a statement made in RFC1122, I believe there are not many such cases if any. Later, David S. Miller davem@redhat.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/