Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757847Ab1CBCHM (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Mar 2011 21:07:12 -0500 Received: from mail-yx0-f174.google.com ([209.85.213.174]:44811 "EHLO mail-yx0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757786Ab1CBCHK convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Mar 2011 21:07:10 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=GzEL1SJ7SvXCgjfxahFE+w5iSiqenW8SzTCXDkPwhoBA2/VpapPn9F/9g/TPpUBE4p m/OMZbiF2s0wK4RqQa96tJB0vnMENfsiyBf+88262S6pQ6SKR/MoN+WprAfAY88ogbiQ UAQSMPyN8FRUqK++et1lnwfULS6hpaFTP0ByM= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20110225010346.GA9019@july> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 11:07:09 +0900 X-Google-Sender-Auth: pgYAU7-Ca5Wy9_Sl2NtYuE4J998 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] fat: Batched discard support for fat From: Kyungmin Park To: Lukas Czerner Cc: OGAWA Hirofumi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 13373 Lines: 387 On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Lukas Czerner wrote: > On Mon, 28 Feb 2011, Kyungmin Park wrote: > >> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 8:17 PM, Lukas Czerner wrote: >> > On Fri, 25 Feb 2011, Kyungmin Park wrote: >> > >> >> From: Kyungmin Park >> >> >> >> FAT supports batched discard as ext4. >> >> >> >> Cited from Lukas words. >> >> "The current solution is not ideal because of its bad performance impact. >> >> So basic idea to improve things is to avoid discarding every time some >> >> blocks are freed. and instead batching is together into bigger trims, >> >> which tends to be more effective." >> >> >> >> You can find an information in detail at following URLs. >> >> http://lwn.net/Articles/397538/ >> >> http://lwn.net/Articles/383933/ >> >> >> >> Clearify the meaning of "len" (Cited form Lukas mail) >> >> >> >> Let the "O" be free (bytes, blocks, whatever), and "=" be used. >> >> Now, we have a filesystem like this. >> >> >> >> ? OOOO==O===OO===OOOOO==O===O===OOOOOOO=== >> >> ? ^ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?^ >> >> ? 0 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?40 >> >> >> >> This is how it supposed to wotk if you have called FITIRM with parameters: >> >> >> >> start = 0 >> >> minlen = 2 >> >> len = 20 >> >> >> >> So you will go through (blocks, bytes...) 0 -> 20 >> >> >> >> ? OOOO==O===OO===OOOOO==O===O===OOOOOOO=== >> >> ? ^ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ^ >> >> ? 0 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 20 >> >> >> >> So, you will call discard on extents: >> >> >> >> 0-3 >> >> You'll skip 6 because is smaller than minlen >> >> 10-11 >> >> 15-19 >> >> >> >> instead of >> >> >> >> 0-3 >> >> 10-11 >> >> 15-19 >> >> 30-36 >> > >> > Hi thanks for the next version. And again I have to ask: Did you test it >> > ? and how ? Did you tried xfstest No. 251 ? Couple of comments bellow. >> >> I tested it with your test program. Of course I modified for our >> environment (eMMC). > > Ok, good. > >> >> #include >> #include >> #include >> #include >> #include >> >> struct fstrim_range { >> ? ? ? ? uint64_t start; >> ? ? ? ? uint64_t len; >> ? ? ? ? uint64_t minlen; >> }; >> >> #define FITRIM ? ? ? ? ?_IOWR('X', 121, struct fstrim_range) >> >> int main(int argc, char **argv) >> { >> ? ? ? ? struct fstrim_range range; >> ? ? ? ? uint64_t len; >> ? ? ? ? int fd; >> >> ? ? ? ? if (argc < 2) { >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? fprintf(stderr, "usage: %s mountpoint [size]\n", argv[0]); >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? return 1; >> ? ? ? ? } >> >> ? ? ? ? if (argc == 3) >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? len = atoll(argv[1]); >> ? ? ? ? else >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? len = ((1UL<<31) - 1); >> >> ? ? ? ? range.start = 0; >> ? ? ? ? range.len = len; >> ? ? ? ? range.minlen = 256 * 1024; ? ? ?/* Minimum is 256KiB */ > > Why exactly you need to set this ? What will happen if the minlen is 0 ? It's dependent on eMMC chip. it's for our environment. If it passed with 0, the code is working but the less than 256KiB trim command is meaningless. > >> >> ? ? ? ? fd = open(argv[1], O_RDONLY); >> ? ? ? ? if (fd < 0) { >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? perror("open"); >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? return 1; >> ? ? ? ? } >> >> ? ? ? ? if (ioctl(fd, FITRIM, &range)) { >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? if (errno == EOPNOTSUPP) >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? fprintf(stderr, "TRIM not supported\n"); >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? else >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? perror("FITRIM"); >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? return 1; >> ? ? ? ? } >> >> ? ? ? ? fprintf(stderr, "Trimmed size %llu\n", range.len); >> >> ? ? ? ? return 0; >> } >> >> > >> > Thanks! >> > -Lukas >> > >> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park >> >> --- >> >> Changelog v3: >> >> ? ? ? Adjust the minlen from queue discard_granularity >> >> ? ? ? Use the corrent len usage >> >> Changelog v2: >> >> ? ? ? Use the given start and len as Lukas comments >> >> ? ? ? Check the queue supports discard feature >> >> --- >> >> diff --git a/fs/fat/fat.h b/fs/fat/fat.h >> >> index f504089..08b53e1 100644 >> >> --- a/fs/fat/fat.h >> >> +++ b/fs/fat/fat.h >> >> @@ -299,6 +299,7 @@ extern int fat_alloc_clusters(struct inode *inode, int *cluster, >> >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? int nr_cluster); >> >> ?extern int fat_free_clusters(struct inode *inode, int cluster); >> >> ?extern int fat_count_free_clusters(struct super_block *sb); >> >> +extern int fat_trim_fs(struct super_block *sb, struct fstrim_range *range); >> >> >> >> ?/* fat/file.c */ >> >> ?extern long fat_generic_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd, >> >> diff --git a/fs/fat/fatent.c b/fs/fat/fatent.c >> >> index b47d2c9..a8e3837 100644 >> >> --- a/fs/fat/fatent.c >> >> +++ b/fs/fat/fatent.c >> >> @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@ >> >> ?/* >> >> ? * Copyright (C) 2004, OGAWA Hirofumi >> >> ? * Released under GPL v2. >> >> + * >> >> + * Batched discard support by Kyungmin Park >> >> ? */ >> >> >> >> ?#include >> >> @@ -541,6 +543,16 @@ out: >> >> ? ? ? return err; >> >> ?} >> >> >> >> +static int fat_issue_discard(struct super_block *sb, int cluster, int nr_clus) >> >> +{ >> >> + ? ? struct msdos_sb_info *sbi = MSDOS_SB(sb); >> >> + ? ? sector_t block, nr_blocks; >> >> + >> >> + ? ? block = fat_clus_to_blknr(sbi, cluster); >> >> + ? ? nr_blocks = nr_clus * sbi->sec_per_clus; >> >> + ? ? return sb_issue_discard(sb, block, nr_blocks, GFP_NOFS, 0); >> >> +} >> >> + >> >> ?int fat_free_clusters(struct inode *inode, int cluster) >> >> ?{ >> >> ? ? ? struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb; >> >> @@ -575,11 +587,7 @@ int fat_free_clusters(struct inode *inode, int cluster) >> >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? if (cluster != fatent.entry + 1) { >> >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? int nr_clus = fatent.entry - first_cl + 1; >> >> >> >> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? sb_issue_discard(sb, >> >> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? fat_clus_to_blknr(sbi, first_cl), >> >> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? nr_clus * sbi->sec_per_clus, >> >> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? GFP_NOFS, 0); >> >> - >> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? fat_issue_discard(sb, first_cl, nr_clus); >> >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? first_cl = cluster; >> >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? } >> >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? } >> >> @@ -683,3 +691,88 @@ out: >> >> ? ? ? unlock_fat(sbi); >> >> ? ? ? return err; >> >> ?} >> >> + >> >> +int fat_trim_fs(struct super_block *sb, struct fstrim_range *range) >> >> +{ >> >> + ? ? struct msdos_sb_info *sbi = MSDOS_SB(sb); >> >> + ? ? struct fatent_operations *ops = sbi->fatent_ops; >> >> + ? ? struct fat_entry fatent; >> >> + ? ? unsigned long reada_blocks, reada_mask, cur_block; >> >> + ? ? int err = 0, free, count, entry; >> >> + ? ? int start, len, minlen, trimmed; >> >> + >> >> + ? ? start = range->start >> sb->s_blocksize_bits; >> >> + ? ? start = start / sbi->sec_per_clus; >> >> + ? ? len = range->len >> sb->s_blocksize_bits; >> >> + ? ? len = len / sbi->sec_per_clus; >> >> + ? ? minlen = range->minlen >> sb->s_blocksize_bits; >> >> + ? ? minlen = minlen / sbi->sec_per_clus; >> >> + ? ? trimmed = 0; >> >> + ? ? count = 0; >> >> + >> >> + ? ? lock_fat(sbi); >> >> + ? ? if (sbi->free_clusters != -1 && sbi->free_clus_valid) >> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? goto out; >> >> + >> >> + ? ? reada_blocks = FAT_READA_SIZE >> sb->s_blocksize_bits; >> >> + ? ? reada_mask = reada_blocks - 1; >> >> + ? ? cur_block = 0; >> >> + >> >> + ? ? entry = 0; >> >> + ? ? free = 0; >> >> + ? ? fatent_init(&fatent); >> >> + >> >> + ? ? if (start < FAT_START_ENT) >> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? start = FAT_START_ENT; >> >> + >> >> + ? ? fatent_set_entry(&fatent, start); >> >> + >> >> + ? ? while (count < sbi->max_cluster) { >> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? if (fatent.entry >= sbi->max_cluster) >> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? fatent.entry = FAT_START_ENT; >> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? /* readahead of fat blocks */ >> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? if ((cur_block & reada_mask) == 0) { >> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? unsigned long rest = sbi->fat_length - cur_block; >> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? fat_ent_reada(sb, &fatent, min(reada_blocks, rest)); >> > >> > You really do not need new variable "rest" just for passing it into one >> > function. Get rid of it. >> >> Umm. I don't want to modify it since it's routine is same as >> free_count codes. I just borrowed it from FAT codes. >> > >> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? } >> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? cur_block++; >> >> + >> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? err = fat_ent_read_block(sb, &fatent); >> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? if (err) >> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? goto out; >> >> + >> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? do { >> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? if (ops->ent_get(&fatent) == FAT_ENT_FREE) { >> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? free++; >> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? if (!entry) >> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? entry = fatent.entry; >> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? if (count >= len && free >= minlen) { >> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? fat_issue_discard(sb, entry, free); >> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? trimmed += free; > > I think you can remove this condition completely is you move "done" > label befor the if (free >= minlen) condition. > >> > I really do not understand FAT code very much, but is this right ? >> > Should not you be setting free = 0 ? >> Right but count is larger then "len". it will exit at next if (count >> >= len) goto done statement. > > Oh, ok I see. But it proves my point that this code is not very well > readable. > >> >> > What will happen if you'll end up >> > in the same branch in next iteration ? -- free will be still set to >> > previous value+1, bu you'll be discarding next entry. I am sorry but >> > this whole thing is not very readable. >> >> > >> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? } >> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? if (count >= len) >> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? goto done; > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > this Okay I will fix it. > >> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? } else if (entry) { >> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? if (free >= minlen) { >> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? fat_issue_discard(sb, entry, free); >> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? trimmed += free; >> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? } >> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? if (count >= len) >> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? goto done; > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > and this > >> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? free = 0; >> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? entry = 0; >> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? } >> > >> > I don't not see why you are testing count all the time since it has not been >> > changed since the "if" condition started. how about doing one test >> > before the "if" condition ? >> >> For looping the whole fat max_cluster size. now start can be any >> address and if start is a middle point and len is max, then it will >> search from middle -> end -> start -> middle. The "count" is used for >> this purpose. >> >> Thank you, >> Kyungmin Park >> > > can go here -->> > ?? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? if (count >= len) > ?? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? goto done; > >> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? count++; >> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? } while (fat_ent_next(sbi, &fatent)); >> >> + ? ? } >> >> + ? ? if (free >= minlen) { >> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? fat_issue_discard(sb, entry, free); >> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? trimmed += free; >> >> + ? ? } >> >> +done: >> >> + ? ? range->len = (trimmed * sbi->sec_per_clus) << sb->s_blocksize_bits; >> >> + ? ? fatent_brelse(&fatent); >> >> +out: >> >> + ? ? unlock_fat(sbi); >> >> + ? ? return err; >> >> +} >> >> diff --git a/fs/fat/file.c b/fs/fat/file.c >> >> index 7257752..9910aba 100644 >> >> --- a/fs/fat/file.c >> >> +++ b/fs/fat/file.c >> >> @@ -125,6 +125,36 @@ long fat_generic_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg) >> >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? return fat_ioctl_get_attributes(inode, user_attr); >> >> ? ? ? case FAT_IOCTL_SET_ATTRIBUTES: >> >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? return fat_ioctl_set_attributes(filp, user_attr); >> >> + ? ? case FITRIM: >> >> + ? ? { >> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb; >> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(sb->s_bdev); >> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? struct fstrim_range range; >> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? int ret = 0; >> >> + >> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) >> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? return -EPERM; >> >> + >> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? if (!blk_queue_discard(q)) >> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? return -EOPNOTSUPP; >> >> + >> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? if (copy_from_user(&range, (struct fstrim_range *)arg, >> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? sizeof(range))) >> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? return -EFAULT; >> >> + >> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? range.minlen = max((unsigned int)range.minlen, >> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? q->limits.discard_granularity); >> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ret = fat_trim_fs(sb, &range); >> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? if (ret < 0) >> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? return ret; >> >> + >> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? if (copy_to_user((struct fstrim_range *)arg, &range, >> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? sizeof(range))) >> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? return -EFAULT; >> >> + >> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? return 0; >> >> + ? ? } >> >> + >> >> ? ? ? default: >> >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? return -ENOTTY; /* Inappropriate ioctl for device */ >> >> ? ? ? } >> >> >> > >> > -- >> > >> > > -- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/