Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757362Ab1CBUE0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2011 15:04:26 -0500 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:48744 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754516Ab1CBUEZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2011 15:04:25 -0500 Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 12:03:39 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: RFC: x86: kill binutils 2.16.x? Message-Id: <20110302120339.efd60504.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <4D6E8932.1010405@zytor.com> References: <4D6E8932.1010405@zytor.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.20.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 892 Lines: 22 On Wed, 02 Mar 2011 10:15:14 -0800 "H. Peter Anvin" wrote: > binutils 2.16 (and presumably its prereleases, binutils 2.15.9x) appears > to have more bugs than any other version of binutils released in modern > history, *before or after*. > > We chronically run into problems because that particular binutils > version breaks code that works fine elsewhere. > > I would like to know who would suffer from formally discontinuing > support for that version. I understand some version of SLES shipped it, > but I don't know for sure. > I gave up and became a customer of http://www.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/index_old.shtml -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/