Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S316649AbSGLQdD>; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 12:33:03 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S316659AbSGLQdC>; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 12:33:02 -0400
Received: from louise.pinerecords.com ([212.71.160.16]:62479 "EHLO
	louise.pinerecords.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S316649AbSGLQdB>; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 12:33:01 -0400
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 18:35:46 +0200
From: Tomas Szepe <szepe@pinerecords.com>
To: JorgP <jorgp@bartnet.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: What is the most stable kernel to date?
Message-ID: <20020712163546.GO29993@louise.pinerecords.com>
References: <120401c229be$58fee4e0$2db2950c@vulcan>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <120401c229be$58fee4e0$2db2950c@vulcan>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-OS: GNU/Linux 2.4.19-pre10/sparc SMP
X-Uptime: 38 days, 1:09
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 595
Lines: 16

> Has anyone conducted any tests to determine what is the most stable (as in
> reliable) kernel available?

There is no such test because there's no way to describe "being stable"
in formulas.

You might as well like to stick with a kernel that has worked for you
for a long enough time. If you don't need the features of 2.4, go with
2.2-latest.

T.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/