Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S316664AbSGLQox>; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 12:44:53 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S316667AbSGLQow>; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 12:44:52 -0400
Received: from e21.nc.us.ibm.com ([32.97.136.227]:23939 "EHLO
	e21.nc.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S316664AbSGLQoO>; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 12:44:14 -0400
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 11:38:01 -0500 (CDT)
From: Paul Larson <plars@austin.ibm.com>
X-X-Sender: <plars@eclipse.ltc.austin.ibm.com>
To: JorgP <jorgp@bartnet.net>
cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: What is the most stable kernel to date?
In-Reply-To: <120401c229be$58fee4e0$2db2950c@vulcan>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0207121135010.13816-100000@eclipse.ltc.austin.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 796
Lines: 21

On Fri, 12 Jul 2002, JorgP wrote:

> Has anyone conducted any tests to determine what is the most stable (as in
> reliable) kernel available?
That's a pretty broad statement to make considering the wide range of
hardware and uses.  Certainly there are many kernels that you could
declare "unstable" (at least wrt certain thing, vm, ide, etc) without too
much argument though.

If you're just looking for a good repository of Linux tests and testing
information, take a look at the Linux Test Project at
http://ltp.sourceforge.net

Thanks,
Paul Larson

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/