Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756310Ab1CCBGI (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2011 20:06:08 -0500 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:46115 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756019Ab1CCBGH (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2011 20:06:07 -0500 Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 17:06:44 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20110302.170644.58413369.davem@davemloft.net> To: lucian.grijincu@gmail.com Cc: adobriyan@gmail.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, tavi@cs.pub.ro, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: RFC v1: sysctl: add sysctl header cookie, share tables between nets From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <1298659961-23863-1-git-send-email-lucian.grijincu@gmail.com> References: <1298659961-23863-1-git-send-email-lucian.grijincu@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.3 on Emacs 23.1 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 621 Lines: 14 From: Lucian Adrian Grijincu Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 20:52:32 +0200 > This is a new approach to the "share sysctl tables" RFC series I > posted earlier this month. I do not disagree conceptually with these changes from a networking perspective, but I am not a sysctl layer expert so I don't know if the generic sysctl bits are a good idea or not. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/