Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 14:53:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 14:53:07 -0400 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:39183 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 14:52:48 -0400 Message-ID: <3D2F261D.4020400@zytor.com> Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 11:55:25 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0rc3) Gecko/20020524 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, sv MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Anton Altaparmakov CC: Linus Torvalds , Martin Dalecki , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: IDE/ATAPI in 2.5 References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020712194731.044115f0@pop.cus.cam.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 940 Lines: 24 Anton Altaparmakov wrote: >> >> Then *please* make a *compatible* interface available to user space. >> This certainly can be done; the parallel port IDE interface stuff had >> exactly such an interface (/dev/pg*) -- we could have a /dev/hg* >> interface presumably. That is an acceptable solution. > > But Linus is wanting exactly that! As far as I understand, Linus would > like a generic interface sitting at the higher layers, and that is used > by the ide/atapi/scsi layers. I read this as implying that the user > space interface will also be only one. It will talk to the higher > layers, the lower layers can then do all the hw specific magic. > That's fine with me. -hpa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/