Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758521Ab1CDP5P (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Mar 2011 10:57:15 -0500 Received: from server103.greatnet.de ([83.133.97.6]:33038 "EHLO server103.greatnet.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750800Ab1CDP5O (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Mar 2011 10:57:14 -0500 Message-ID: <4D710BD2.3070303@nachtwindheim.de> Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 16:57:06 +0100 From: Henrik Kretzschmar User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101227 Icedove/3.0.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Cyrill Gorcunov CC: mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/7] x86: remove superflous goal definition of tsc_sync References: <1299239923-7092-1-git-send-email-henne@nachtwindheim.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 738 Lines: 23 Am 04.03.2011 13:50, schrieb Cyrill Gorcunov: >> Probably we better write it this way: >> >> - obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += smpboot.o tsc_sync.o >> - obj-$(CONFIG_X86_64_SMP) += tsc_sync.o >> >> + obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += smpboot.o >> + obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += tsc_sync.o >> Yes, I see what you mean. Removing/adding one item on such a multiple item line makes muddled diffs. Thank you for friendly reviewing, patience and your Acked-by, Henrik Kretzschmar -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/