Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759671Ab1CDQK3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Mar 2011 11:10:29 -0500 Received: from mail-fx0-f46.google.com ([209.85.161.46]:48970 "EHLO mail-fx0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758521Ab1CDQK1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Mar 2011 11:10:27 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=ZPbOc+jYtMz3X4auKhPlg/pJuTtAp8zcugs4nsCkr2xlS9ogmGCO6Unt9TMUyvYp1G 0lJnV62lZbm9fmXoVUpEkdgksK0xAl6aX6VGuessEVsD9HRnalOtlvy4XtzevQHHGkxx /aO2BwZFTdE3VOgYvucBrWF+1k9953fUlVsP0= Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 17:10:18 +0100 From: Richard Cochran To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, richard.cochran@omicron.at, johnstul@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ptp: add a software clock based on clock_monotonic_raw Message-ID: <20110304161018.GA4527@riccoc20.at.omicron.at> References: <1299173174-348-1-git-send-email-torbenh@gmx.de> <1299173174-348-3-git-send-email-torbenh@gmx.de> <20110304064251.GC3824@riccoc20.at.omicron.at> <20110304113032.GC3237@siel.b> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110304113032.GC3237@siel.b> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1084 Lines: 31 On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 12:30:32PM +0100, torbenh wrote: > On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 07:42:51AM +0100, Richard Cochran wrote: > > > > Better yet, why not just use the V6 example instead? If we are going > > to have a testing driver, then I would want the simulated ancillary > > code as well. > > well... your example code messes with clock_realtime. But could you take the file and replace the CLOCK_REALTIME code with your SW implemented offset/frequency corrections? And, just keep my code for simulating the ancillary stuff as is. > i was planning to emit real timed events, not just some simulation. > but i dont completely understand this part of the code yet. ??? (None of my PHC patches implement any user timers.) I am not sure where you are going with the AVB clock idea, but it will be fun to find out. Thanks, Richard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/