Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 18:12:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 18:12:10 -0400 Received: from ns.suse.de ([213.95.15.193]:13834 "EHLO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 12 Jul 2002 18:12:08 -0400 Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 00:14:56 +0200 From: Dave Jones To: Roman Zippel Cc: Thunder from the hill , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [CHECKER] 56 potential lock/unlock bugs in 2.5.8 Message-ID: <20020713001456.H18503@suse.de> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Roman Zippel , Thunder from the hill , Linux Kernel Mailing List References: <20020712233849.G18503@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from zippel@linux-m68k.org on Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 11:56:07PM +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 886 Lines: 22 On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 11:56:07PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote: > > if 2.4/2.5 AFFS is in sync as you say (which iirc it is), then > > I fail to see how you think the 2.5.25 disassembly is an old version. > The last disassembled instruction is the PageUptodate() test, which was > moved in later versions and can't be that early in the function for a > recent version, but the disassembly is exactly what I would expect from > an old affs version. Hmm, interesting. Time to test the possibility of a ccache bug I think. How old exactly out of curiosity ? Dave -- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/