Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S313125AbSGMNbh>; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 09:31:37 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S313181AbSGMNbg>; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 09:31:36 -0400
Received: from ip152-101-138-27.ip.hk.net ([152.101.138.27]:49925 "EHLO
	ited.yingwa.edu.hk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S313125AbSGMNbg>; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 09:31:36 -0400
From: c0330 <c0330@yingwa.edu.hk>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Future of Kernel tree 2.0 ............
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 21:35:03 +0000
Message-Id: <E17TUXf-0000Ow-00@ited.yingwa.edu.hk>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 675
Lines: 19

Hi everbody,

  Will kernel tree 2.0 stop developing and regard historical after the release 
of 2.6?  I think we would put our focus on much more newer kernel. And I found 
this may confuse the newbies, because they don't know much about versioning in 
Kernel.

  In nowsdays, there are less less compputers using 2.0. We should push them to 
upgrade, so I think stop developing 2.0 is better, in my opinion

------
 0330
------

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/