Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S313416AbSGMNi6>; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 09:38:58 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S313421AbSGMNi5>; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 09:38:57 -0400
Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:15115 "HELO
	garrincha.netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP
	id <S313416AbSGMNiz>; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 09:38:55 -0400
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 10:41:22 -0300 (BRT)
From: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com
To: c0330 <c0330@yingwa.edu.hk>
cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Future of Kernel tree 2.0 ............
In-Reply-To: <E17TUXf-0000Ow-00@ited.yingwa.edu.hk>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L.0207131039300.12241-100000@imladris.surriel.com>
X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org
X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 903
Lines: 25

On Sat, 13 Jul 2002, c0330 wrote:

>   In nowsdays, there are less less compputers using 2.0. We should push
> them to upgrade, so I think stop developing 2.0 is better, in my opinion

I've never seen you develop 2.0.  How can you stop if you didn't start ?

I think the people who use and maintain 2.0 should decide for themselves
whether maintaining 2.0 is worth it for them. The 2.0 maintenance isn't
taking away any energy from 2.4 and 2.5 development, so there is no reason
to ask people to stop doing what is useful for them.

regards,

Rik
-- 
Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".

http://www.surriel.com/		http://distro.conectiva.com/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/