Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S313419AbSGMNk6>; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 09:40:58 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S313537AbSGMNk5>; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 09:40:57 -0400
Received: from [62.70.58.70] ([62.70.58.70]:15499 "EHLO mail.pronto.tv")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S313419AbSGMNky> convert rfc822-to-8bit;
	Sat, 13 Jul 2002 09:40:54 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@karlsbakk.net>
Organization: ProntoTV AS
To: c0330 <c0330@yingwa.edu.hk>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Future of Kernel tree 2.0 ............
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 15:43:49 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.4.1
References: <E17TUXf-0000Ow-00@ited.yingwa.edu.hk>
In-Reply-To: <E17TUXf-0000Ow-00@ited.yingwa.edu.hk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Message-Id: <200207131543.49094.roy@karlsbakk.net>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 825
Lines: 21

>   Will kernel tree 2.0 stop developing and regard historical after the
> release of 2.6?  I think we would put our focus on much more newer kernel.
> And I found this may confuse the newbies, because they don't know much
> about versioning in Kernel.
>
>   In nowsdays, there are less less compputers using 2.0. We should push
> them to upgrade, so I think stop developing 2.0 is better, in my opinion

Is there any reason at all to use 2.0 instead of 2.2?

-- 
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk, Datavaktmester

Computers are like air conditioners.
They stop working when you open Windows.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/