Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S314680AbSGMPdq>; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 11:33:46 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S314707AbSGMPdp>; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 11:33:45 -0400
Received: from 213-96-124-18.uc.nombres.ttd.es ([213.96.124.18]:52718 "HELO
	dardhal.mired.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id <S314680AbSGMPdo>;
	Sat, 13 Jul 2002 11:33:44 -0400
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 17:36:29 +0200
From: Jose Luis Domingo Lopez <linux-kernel@24x7linux.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Future of Kernel tree 2.0 ............
Message-ID: <20020713153629.GA17657@localhost>
Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <E17TUXf-0000Ow-00@ited.yingwa.edu.hk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <E17TUXf-0000Ow-00@ited.yingwa.edu.hk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 799
Lines: 19

On Saturday, 13 July 2002, at 21:35:03 +0000,
c0330 wrote:

>   Will kernel tree 2.0 stop developing and regard historical after the 
> release of 2.6?  I think we would put our focus on much more newer kernel. 
> And I found this may confuse the newbies, because they don't know much 
> about versioning in Kernel.
> 
Newbies should trust their Linux vendor and keep using the kernel
versions they provide. At least while they are still newbies ;-)

-- 
Jose Luis Domingo Lopez
Linux Registered User #189436     Debian Linux Woody (Linux 2.4.19-pre6aa1)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/