Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S315179AbSGMQEr>; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 12:04:47 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S315192AbSGMQEq>; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 12:04:46 -0400
Received: from h209-71-227-55.gtconnect.net ([209.71.227.55]:57103 "HELO
	innerfire.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id <S315179AbSGMQEp>;
	Sat, 13 Jul 2002 12:04:45 -0400
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 12:07:36 -0400 (EDT)
From: Gerhard Mack <gmack@innerfire.net>
To: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@karlsbakk.net>
cc: c0330 <c0330@yingwa.edu.hk>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Future of Kernel tree 2.0 ............
In-Reply-To: <200207131543.49094.roy@karlsbakk.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0207131204450.12380-100000@innerfire.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 587
Lines: 20

On Sat, 13 Jul 2002, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:

> Is there any reason at all to use 2.0 instead of 2.2?

On a new system probably not .. on an old system however the effort needed
to upgrade all of the related utilities just isn't worth it.


--
Gerhard Mack

gmack@innerfire.net

<>< As a computer I find your faith in technology amusing.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/