Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754586Ab1CJCIp (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Mar 2011 21:08:45 -0500 Received: from mail-gy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.160.174]:52696 "EHLO mail-gy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755120Ab1CJCHo (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Mar 2011 21:07:44 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; b=NwbukFywP2VgaAgfg9a43L3JTx3t5fmv6QDcNW83cjTB0v7gMGkXh7bB0U9f3s8xwc t4aKcx2f1Ce5WKkO2ujnfbhQQ0wJHTtJU9F9yVrgJRZLpbkej8qAyP/NuryzD+ajc0wn +dtb6/EwS026Zsu6EALo8f2F967Gm/y6BToIk= Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 10:07:21 +0800 From: Harry Wei To: Steven Rostedt Cc: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, joe@perches.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Fwd: [PATCH 05/18] MAINTAINERS: Remove unnecessary linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org entries Message-ID: <20110310020718.GA2976@gmail.com> Mail-Followup-To: Steven Rostedt , broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, joe@perches.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <03b0dc89c5badbc0b8f155ecdd5912cad3e278f2.1298439175.git.joe@perches.com> <20110301112038.GA12568@sirena.org.uk> <20110301141024.GA9014@gmail.com> <20110301141308.GG9662@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20110301144712.GA9798@gmail.com> <20110308194538.GA8002@home.goodmis.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110308194538.GA8002@home.goodmis.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1397 Lines: 35 On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 02:45:38PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 10:47:15PM +0800, Harry Wei wrote: > > > > > > > I agree with Joe. I think any patch about kernel should be > > > > emailed to LKML and other connection ML, as well as maintainers. > > > > > > You're missing my point. My point is that removing references to LKML > > > from MAINTAINERS is working against this as it makes it harder for users > > > to work out that they're supposed to do this. > > Maybe you are right. > > Perhaps we should just add at the beginning of MAINTAINERS a note that > says something to the effect: "When in doubt, Cc > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org". And then remove all individual references > to the list. This sounds good. I think we should have a try. Could i patch for this thought? Any different idea for us? Thanks. Best Regards. Harry Wei. > > -- Steve > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/