Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752804Ab1CJO7t (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Mar 2011 09:59:49 -0500 Received: from e32.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.150]:52308 "EHLO e32.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751798Ab1CJO7s (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Mar 2011 09:59:48 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH R4 7/7] xen/balloon: Memory hotplug support for Xen balloon driver From: Dave Hansen To: Daniel Kiper Cc: ian.campbell@citrix.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, andi.kleen@intel.com, haicheng.li@linux.intel.com, fengguang.wu@intel.com, jeremy@goop.org, konrad.wilk@oracle.com, dan.magenheimer@oracle.com, v.tolstov@selfip.ru, pasik@iki.fi, wdauchy@gmail.com, rientjes@google.com, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org In-Reply-To: <20110310090207.GB13978@router-fw-old.local.net-space.pl> References: <20110308215049.GH27331@router-fw-old.local.net-space.pl> <1299628939.9014.3499.camel@nimitz> <20110310090207.GB13978@router-fw-old.local.net-space.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 06:59:25 -0800 Message-ID: <1299769165.8937.2435.camel@nimitz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1351 Lines: 37 On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 10:02 +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote: > On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 04:02:19PM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote: > > > + mutex_lock(&balloon_mutex); > > > + > > > + __balloon_append(page); > > > + > > > + if (balloon_stats.hotplug_pages) > > > + --balloon_stats.hotplug_pages; > > > + else > > > + --balloon_stats.balloon_hotplug; > > > + > > > + mutex_unlock(&balloon_mutex); > > > + > > > + return NOTIFY_STOP; > > > +} > > > > I'm not a _huge_ fan of these notifier chains, but I guess it works. > > Could you tell me why ??? I think that in that case new > (faster, simpler, etc.) mechanism is an overkill. I prefer > to use something which is writen, tested and ready for usage. Personally, I find it much harder to figure out what's going on there than if we had some #ifdefs or plain old function calls. It would be one thing if we really had a large or undefined set of things that needs to interact here, but we really just need to conditionally free the page either in to the buddy allocator or back to Xen. I think that calls for a simpler mechanism than notifier_blocks. -- Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/