Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 17:34:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 17:34:13 -0500 Received: from neon-gw.transmeta.com ([209.10.217.66]:15621 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 17:34:00 -0500 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: torvalds@transmeta.com (Linus Torvalds) Subject: Re: test12: innd bug came back? Date: 13 Dec 2000 14:03:01 -0800 Organization: Transmeta Corporation Message-ID: <918rml$53u$1@penguin.transmeta.com> In-Reply-To: <918pmt$q9s$1@osiris.storner.dk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In article , Alexander Viro wrote: > > >On 13 Dec 2000, Henrik [ISO-8859-1] St?rner wrote: > >> Just to add a "me too" on this. I didn't report when I saw it last week, >> because I was uncertain of exactly what might have caused it - I was >> booting several different kernels at the time, including one from a >> rescue disk (I was trying to salvage bits of a Win9x disk at the time - >> don't ask for details!) >> >> Alas, I lost the test program someone wrote to test for the truncate >> problem, and due to moving I will not be able to test anything until >> next Monday. But if needed, I can do some testing then. Something >> definitely went wrong with innd during the test12 pre-patches. > >It may be a side effect of removing partial_clear() in test12-final. No. If you read the code, partial_clear() has been a no-op for the longest time (the "start & ~PAGE_MASK" thing could never trigger, as "start" has been page-aligned for a long long while now. So it must be something else. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/