Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752369Ab1CJUut (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Mar 2011 15:50:49 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:26791 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751125Ab1CJUur (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Mar 2011 15:50:47 -0500 Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 15:50:09 -0500 From: Dave Jones To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, Linux PM mailing list , LKML , Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Remove the pm_message_t argument from driver suspend Message-ID: <20110310205008.GB7750@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, Linux PM mailing list , LKML , Greg KH References: <201103102113.05946.rjw@sisk.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201103102113.05946.rjw@sisk.pl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 801 Lines: 27 On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 09:13:05PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > None of the existing cpufreq drivers uses the second argument of > its .suspend() callback (which isn't useful anyway), so remove it. > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki > --- > > Hi, > > This patch is requisite for sysdevs rework discussed here: > https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/3/9/439 > Please apply or let me know if I can take it to the suspend tree. Looks ok to me. applied and queued for .39 thanks, Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/