Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 17:36:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 17:35:53 -0500 Received: from ppp0.ocs.com.au ([203.34.97.3]:55558 "HELO mail.ocs.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 17:35:47 -0500 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 From: Keith Owens To: Alan Cox cc: chris@chrullrich.de (Christian Ullrich), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: insmod problem after modutils upgrading In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 13 Dec 2000 21:10:54 -0000." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 09:05:13 +1100 Message-ID: <4381.976745113@ocs3.ocs-net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 13 Dec 2000 21:10:54 +0000 (GMT), Alan Cox wrote: >It is modutils. Their behaviour changed in a non back compatible way. Do not >use modutils 2.3.22 with Linux 2.2.* is the simple answer. Perhaps Keith can >make this a warning in 2.3.23 Adding persistent module data to modutils meant that insmod had to be a lot more picky about MODULE_PARM() entries. There were a few modules that had invalid MODULE_PARM() entries, nobody had spotted them previously because nobody used those options. Since these are bugs in the modules and only a few modules are affected (less than 5 reported), the fix is to correct the modules that have coding errors. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/