Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 10:27:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 10:27:33 -0400 Received: from mailhub.fokus.gmd.de ([193.174.154.14]:58520 "EHLO mailhub.fokus.gmd.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 10:27:31 -0400 Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 16:28:49 +0200 (CEST) From: Joerg Schilling Message-Id: <200207141428.g6EESn7r019159@burner.fokus.gmd.de> To: aia21@cantab.net, schilling@fokus.gmd.de Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: IDE/ATAPI in 2.5 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1414 Lines: 33 >From aia21@cantab.net Sun Jul 14 15:38:33 2002 >At 14:24 14/07/02, Joerg Schilling wrote: >>[...] In addition, if the drive would support DAE via some non-standard >>interface [...]. The DAE quality would be lousy [...]. >This is a very presumptuous statement! You cannot assume that an >alternative interface would be of lousy quality. Maybe it is a million >times better? The current one (at least as some drives implement it on the >drive side) can be of very, very poor quality indeed. Name a single drive that is DAE capable, does not support ATAPI and doesn't do DAE in lousy quality. >Note: I am not saying that there is an alternative interface or anything >like that... just that your statement is fallacious. Your statements just proove that you didn't try to get the background information that is needed to find a useful and seminal future development. J?rg EMail:joerg@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) J?rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin js@cs.tu-berlin.de (uni) If you don't have iso-8859-1 schilling@fokus.gmd.de (work) chars I am J"org Schilling URL: http://www.fokus.gmd.de/usr/schilling ftp://ftp.fokus.gmd.de/pub/unix - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/