Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 10:41:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 10:41:53 -0400 Received: from purple.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.4]:28893 "EHLO purple.csi.cam.ac.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 10:41:52 -0400 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020714153821.00b232d0@pop.cus.cam.ac.uk> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 15:45:39 +0100 To: Joerg Schilling From: Anton Altaparmakov Subject: Re: IDE/ATAPI in 2.5 Cc: schilling@fokus.gmd.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <200207141428.g6EESn7r019159@burner.fokus.gmd.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2144 Lines: 48 At 15:28 14/07/02, Joerg Schilling wrote: > >From aia21@cantab.net Sun Jul 14 15:38:33 2002 > >At 14:24 14/07/02, Joerg Schilling wrote: > >>[...] In addition, if the drive would support DAE via some non-standard > >>interface [...]. The DAE quality would be lousy [...]. > > >This is a very presumptuous statement! You cannot assume that an > >alternative interface would be of lousy quality. Maybe it is a million > >times better? The current one (at least as some drives implement it on the > >drive side) can be of very, very poor quality indeed. > >Name a single drive that is DAE capable, does not support ATAPI and >doesn't do DAE in lousy quality. I don't need to. As I said in the following paragraph, I never claimed such a thing existed. I am only complaining about your generalisations which to me imply that an alternative better interface cannot and could not exist. Which is a pile of crap. Maybe tomorrow someone will come up with a much better interface/drive. That is all I am saying. You cannot see into the future to be able to make such generalisations... > >Note: I am not saying that there is an alternative interface or anything > >like that... just that your statement is fallacious. > >Your statements just proove that you didn't try to get the background >information >that is needed to find a useful and seminal future development. WHAT?!? Get off your high horse, will you? I never claimed anything to prompt this response. I am just telling you off for misleading people with your statements... Anton, who is starting to get pissed off with Mr Joerg "I know everything" Schilling -- "I've not lost my mind. It's backed up on tape somewhere." - Unknown -- Anton Altaparmakov (replace at with @) Linux NTFS Maintainer / IRC: #ntfs on irc.openprojects.net WWW: http://linux-ntfs.sf.net/ & http://www-stu.christs.cam.ac.uk/~aia21/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/