Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 12:54:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 12:54:13 -0400 Received: from p50886DAC.dip.t-dialin.net ([80.136.109.172]:10633 "EHLO hawkeye.luckynet.adm") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 12:54:12 -0400 Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 10:56:54 -0600 (MDT) From: Thunder from the hill X-X-Sender: thunder@hawkeye.luckynet.adm To: Martin Dalecki cc: Paul Bristow , Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: IDE/ATAPI in 2.5 In-Reply-To: <3D3184EF.8040109@evision-ventures.com> Message-ID: X-Location: Potsdam; Germany MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1003 Lines: 31 Hi, > My concern is only the fact that it would be easier in my opinnion to > start off with ide-scsi and make it *independant* from the SCSI code or > device handling by separating commonly used code for MMC_ handling out > of SCSI in a kind of library (that is it) and not a common "layer" (this > could be a second step). What about some kind of retval_t mmc_to_hostcmd(host, cmd, ...); response_t response_to_mmc(host, ...); ? Regards, Thunder -- (Use http://www.ebb.org/ungeek if you can't decode) ------BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK------ Version: 3.12 GCS/E/G/S/AT d- s++:-- a? C++$ ULAVHI++++$ P++$ L++++(+++++)$ E W-$ N--- o? K? w-- O- M V$ PS+ PE- Y- PGP+ t+ 5+ X+ R- !tv b++ DI? !D G e++++ h* r--- y- ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/