Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 15:12:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 15:12:32 -0400 Received: from zork.zork.net ([66.92.188.166]:18367 "EHLO zork.zork.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 15:12:31 -0400 Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 20:15:24 +0100 From: Sean Neakums To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: IDE/ATAPI in 2.5 Message-ID: <20020714191524.GB9202@zork.net> Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200207141811.g6EIBXKc019318@burner.fokus.gmd.de> <20020714184006.GA13867@louise.pinerecords.com> <20020714190657.GB13867@louise.pinerecords.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020714190657.GB13867@louise.pinerecords.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Fnord: +++ath X-WebTV-Stationery: Standard; BGColor=black; TextColor=black X-Message-Flag: Message text advisory: HACKING, DENIAL OF THE ANTECEDENT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1529 Lines: 41 commence Tomas Szepe quotation: > > > A Pentium 1200 running Linux-2.5.25 (ext3) results in: > > > > > > # star -xp -time < rock.tar.bz2 > > > star: WARNING: Archive is bzip2 compressed, trying to use the -bz option. > > > star: 10372 blocks + 1536 bytes (total of 106210816 bytes = 103721.50k). > > > star: Total time 3190.483sec (32 kBytes/sec) > > > 53:10.490r 12.299u 2970.099s 93% 0M 0+0k 0st 0+0io 4411pf+0w > > > > > > You see, during the 53:20, the machine is only 7% idle! > > > > A Pentium 1200, eh? > > More like Pentium 120 or star just doesn't cut it. > > Now I'm actually pretty sure you meant 386DX/33! > > I don't know whom you're trying to fool, but even my P2/233 > can get the work done in under 5 minutes: > > kala@hubert:/tmp$ time tar xjf rock.tar.bz2 > > real 4m50.598s > user 0m36.700s > sys 1m51.860s > > Linux 2.4.19-pre10-ac2, reiserfs 3.6. Aha, but reiserfs's directories are indexed, are they not? Whereas ext3's directories are flat and require a linear search for lookups and modifications. This may be what Joerg's example highlights. -- / | [|] Sean Neakums | Questions are a burden to others; [|] | answers a prison for oneself. \ | - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/