Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 15:40:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 15:40:05 -0400 Received: from louise.pinerecords.com ([212.71.160.16]:65297 "EHLO louise.pinerecords.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 15:40:02 -0400 Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 21:42:50 +0200 From: Tomas Szepe To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Sean Neakums , Joerg Schilling Subject: Re: IDE/ATAPI in 2.5 Message-ID: <20020714194250.GC13867@louise.pinerecords.com> References: <200207141811.g6EIBXKc019318@burner.fokus.gmd.de> <20020714184006.GA13867@louise.pinerecords.com> <20020714190657.GB13867@louise.pinerecords.com> <20020714191524.GB9202@zork.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020714191524.GB9202@zork.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-OS: GNU/Linux 2.4.19-pre10/sparc SMP X-Uptime: 40 days, 10:24 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1881 Lines: 48 > > > > A Pentium 1200 running Linux-2.5.25 (ext3) results in: > > > > > > > > # star -xp -time < rock.tar.bz2 > > > > star: WARNING: Archive is bzip2 compressed, trying to use the -bz option. > > > > star: 10372 blocks + 1536 bytes (total of 106210816 bytes = 103721.50k). > > > > star: Total time 3190.483sec (32 kBytes/sec) > > > > 53:10.490r 12.299u 2970.099s 93% 0M 0+0k 0st 0+0io 4411pf+0w > > > > > > > > You see, during the 53:20, the machine is only 7% idle! > > > > > > A Pentium 1200, eh? > > > More like Pentium 120 or star just doesn't cut it. > > > > Now I'm actually pretty sure you meant 386DX/33! > > > > I don't know whom you're trying to fool, but even my P2/233 > > can get the work done in under 5 minutes: > > > > kala@hubert:/tmp$ time tar xjf rock.tar.bz2 > > > > real 4m50.598s > > user 0m36.700s > > sys 1m51.860s > > > > Linux 2.4.19-pre10-ac2, reiserfs 3.6. > > Aha, but reiserfs's directories are indexed, are they not? Whereas > ext3's directories are flat and require a linear search for lookups > and modifications. This may be what Joerg's example highlights. Unfortunately, I don't have an ext3 partition handy to perform a quick test, but the following Joerg's accusation has been invalidated nonetheless: > Solaris and FreeBSD put all the effort into one filesystem trying to make > it as good as possible. In Linux, it seems that nobody prooved the overall > concept of the kernel. If that's the case, how come a Linux-powered Pentium 233 can do in 5 minutes for what a Solaris-powered Pentium 800 needs 7 minutes? I believe Joerg owes a big big apology to Al Viro here. T. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/