Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 16:19:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 16:19:10 -0400 Received: from esteel10.client.dti.net ([209.73.14.10]:7365 "EHLO shookay.newview.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 16:19:08 -0400 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: IDE/ATAPI in 2.5 References: <200207142004.g6EK4LaV019433@burner.fokus.gmd.de> <20020714201529.GA14244@louise.pinerecords.com> From: Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer Date: 14 Jul 2002 16:21:53 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20020714201529.GA14244@louise.pinerecords.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1133 Lines: 24 szepe@pinerecords.com (Tomas Szepe) writes: > [OT stuff scrapped] > > > >I honestly doubt ext3 would perform significantly worse than what I've > > >observed with reiserfs. > > Just try it, I did try it. > > Someone else will have to carry out the test, I really can't free up > any of my partitions for a re-mkfs. I'm running tar (the regular version not star) right now on an Athlon @ 850. The fs is ext3 and the disk is a scsi drive. So far, tar has been running for 17 min 25 sec, and that's what top says: CPU states: 1.7% user, 98.2% system, 0.0% nice, 0.0% idle (FYI, nothing else is taking some large amount of cpu time) So I would say Joerg is right... :-( -- Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer E-Mail : mathieu@newview.com It is exactly because a man cannot do a thing that he is a proper judge of it. -- Oscar Wilde - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/